Home / Case studies / Industry reference
Industry referenceEL and thermography · 21 MW

Broken modules still connected to strings at a Rajasthan plant

Saur Energy article on solar diagnostics · 21 MW plant, Rajasthan

Not a Retron project. This example is from Saur Energy article on solar diagnostics. It shows the kind of work involved.
1,829modules imaged with EL and thermal
4.6%moderately damaged
115modules with hotspots
130broken modules still in strings

The situation

Damaged and broken modules were suspected at the plant, and some were still connected to their strings.

Background

A broken module left in a string can drag down the whole string and become a hotspot or safety risk. At 21 MW, walking every row is slow, so a combination of sampling and aerial scanning was used.

What was tested, and how that method works

EL and thermal imaging of 1,829 modules, plus drone-based thermography of the plant.

Thermal imaging records surface temperature. A cracked or shaded cell that is dissipating power shows up hotter than its neighbours. A drone makes it practical to cover a whole plant. EL imaging is used on a sample to see the cell-level cause.

Our service: Thermography →

What was found

  • About 0.28% of modules were severely damaged and about 4.6% moderately damaged.
  • 115 of the 1,829 imaged modules showed hotspots.
  • Drone thermography found 130 broken modules still in strings, about 144 kWp combined, with a net plant impact of about 18 kWp.

How it unfolded

SuspicionDamaged modules suspected at the 21 MW plant.
SampleEL and thermal imaging of 1,829 modules.
Whole plantDrone thermography across the site.
FindingsBroken modules found still connected to strings.

Outcome

The article does not report what was repaired afterwards.

Lessons for a plant owner

  • Sampling with EL and sweeping the whole plant with drone thermography find different things. Together they give a fuller picture.
  • A broken module left connected can be a safety issue as well as an energy loss.
  • The reported net impact (about 18 kWp) was small compared with the combined size of the broken modules. Context matters when judging loss.

Questions to ask about your own plant

  • Which broken modules are still connected in our strings?
  • When was the last whole-plant thermal sweep?
  • Do our reports separate cosmetic damage from electrical damage?

How we would approach a similar site

We would pair a sampled EL check with a thermal survey of the whole plant, and list modules to replace.

Figures are as reported in the article. The plant owner is not named. Source: Saur Energy. Summarised in our own words.